Proanthocyanidin AND Glaucoma

by | Apr 26, 2025

Proanthocyanidins, particularly those found in grape seed extract, may help protect retinal ganglion cells against oxidative stress and mitochondrial alterations, which are important factors in glaucoma. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), a significant risk factor for glaucoma, can lead to retinal ganglion cell death. Some research suggests that proanthocyanidins may reduce eye pressure and improve visual function. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Elaboration: [1, 1, 2, 2]

  • Oxidative Stress and Glaucoma: In glaucoma, oxidative stress can damage retinal ganglion cells, contributing to their death. [1, 1, 2, 2, 5]
  • Proanthocyanidin’s Protective Role: Proanthocyanidins, especially those from grape seed extract, have been shown to protect against oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage in retinal ganglion cells. [1, 1, 2, 2]
  • Potential for IOP Reduction: Some studies suggest that proanthocyanidins may help reduce eye pressure (IOP) and improve visual function in glaucoma patients. [3, 3, 4, 4, 6, 7]
  • Neuroprotection and Antioxidant Properties: Proanthocyanidins also exhibit neuroprotective and antioxidant properties, which may further benefit eye health. [3, 3, 4]
  • Clinical Relevance: While promising, more research is needed to fully understand the role of proanthocyanidins in glaucoma treatment and prevention. [2, 2, 3, 3, 8, 9]
  • Proanthocyanidins have been the subject of recent research, demonstrating antibactierial[9], antiviral[10,11], anticarcinogenic[12], anti-inflammatory[13,14], antiallergicvasodilatory[15,16], antiswelling[17] and neuroprotective activities[18,19,20,21]. More recently, Yang et al[22] verified that the grape seed extract was able to protect oxidative stressed-induced retinal ganglion cell damage. The in vitro studies on both Retinal Ganglion Cell-5 cell lines and retinal explants demonstrate that oligomeric proanthocyanidin can protect the oxidative stress injured retinal ganglion cells by inhibiting the apoptotic process, thus indicating a potential application of oligomeric proanthocyanidin in the clinical treatment of glaucoma and other optic diseases.1,

Generative AI is experimental.

[1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4146041/

[2] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33078305/

[3] https://www.grandridgeeyeclinic.com/glaucoma-supplements.html

[4] https://www.vision-and-eye-health.com/best-glaucoma-supplements/

[5] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/adbi.202300530

[6] https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b453/c4a89f5e603ba5d8655c33bf24eed83e4891.pdf

[7] https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10086832/3/Foster_Heavy%20metal%20toxicity%20and%20the%20aetiology%20of%20glaucoma_AAM.pdf

[8] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11130796/

[9] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8772744/

Ivermectin + Mebendazole taken together produce remarkably Positive Clinical Cancer Benefits in 84.4% of Patients.

The largest real-world human analysis to date evaluating ivermectin and mebendazole in cancer patients has just been published—and the results represent one of the most compelling clinical signals ever documented for repurposed anti-parasitic therapies in oncology.

This groundbreaking analysis was made possible through a unique collaboration between The Wellness Company, the McCullough Foundation, and the Chairman of the President’s Cancer Panel (Dr. Harvey Risch)—uniting real-world clinical data, frontline medical experience, and high-level epidemiologic expertise to deliver urgently needed insights in oncology.

This was a real-world prospective clinical program evaluation of 197 cancer patients, with 122 completing a follow-up survey at about six months (61.9% response rate).

Cancer patients were prescribed compounded ivermectin–mebendazole, with each capsule containing 25 mg ivermectin and 250 mg mebendazole—most commonly taken at 1–2 capsules per day.

The cohort represented a clinically relevant population, including a wide variety cancer types, with 37.1% of patients reporting actively progressing disease at baseline and many having already undergone chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery.

At six months, 84.4% of cancer patients reported clinical benefit (Clinical Benefit Ratio: 84.4% [95% CI: 77.0–89.8%]):

✅ 32.8% reported NO evidence of cancer (95% CI: 25.1–41.5%)
✅ 15.6% reported tumor regression (95% CI: 10.2–23.0%)
✅ 36.1% reported stable disease (95% CI: 28.1–44.9%)

Treatment adherence was high, with 86.9% completing the full protocol and 66.4% remaining on therapy at six months.

The regimen was well tolerated, with 25.4% reporting side effects, primarily mild and gastrointestinal, and over 93% continuing treatment despite these events.

Patients were treated in real-world conditions alongside concurrent therapies, including chemotherapy (27.9%), radiation (21.3%), surgery (19.7%), supplements (49.2%), and dietary modification (37.7%), supporting use as an adjunctive approach.

Together, these findings represent a large, internally consistent real-world clinical signal that supports URGENT further investigation of ivermectin and mebendazole as low-toxicity, adjunctive cancer therapies.

Given the strength of the signal observed here, advancing this line of investigation is no longer optional—it is necessary.

This is NOT the end. We will continue advancing this work with larger datasets to further define and validate the role of anti-parasitics in cancer outcomes.

The manuscript is now available as a preprint on the Zenodo research repository, operated by the European Organization for Nuclear Research, while undergoing peer review at leading oncology journals: “Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Ivermectin and Mebendazole in Cancer Patients: Results from a Prospective Observational Cohort.”

Bar chart showing distribution of common cancer types with breast cancer most prevalent.
Infographic on disease status and median duration since diagnosis.

Receive Our Newsletter

3 + 14 =

jQuery( document ).ready(function( $ ) { // $( "div" ).hide(); });